• Home
  • Historical notes
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

UkrainianProfessional Education

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 24.04.2024

Revised 30.08.2024

Accepted 27.09.2024

Retrieved from Iss. 116, P. 1, 2024

Pages 92 -101

  • 138 Views

Suggested citation

Usychenko, O., & Plytus, R. (2024). THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE STABILITY OF A REINFORCED SOIL RETAINING WALL ON A WEAK BASE. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, (116.1), 92-101. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2024-116.1-092-101

THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE STABILITY OF A REINFORCED SOIL RETAINING WALL ON A WEAK BASE

Olena Usychenko Rostyslav Plytus

Abstract

The purpose of the proposed article is to describe a practical example, experimental and theoretical analysis of strengthening weak soils with geogrids in the base based on field studies of a reinforced soil structure near an overpass. The authors present practical data from field studies of settlement of a reinforced soil structure reinforced with a stabilizing geogrid. The actual data of monitoring the settlement of the structure during two years of operation are presented. The calculated and actual data on the structure near the overpass at km 759+149 of the public road of national importance M-12 are analyzed. Sufficient previous experience in the design of ground structures with geosynthetic reinforcement with geogrids makes it possible to monitor facilities during operation, and a more detailed understanding of the mechanics of operation and calculation methods for such structures allows for the improvement and optimization of such structures at the design stage through monitoring work. The authors have proven that the use of a stabilizing mattress under a 9-meter-high reinforced concrete structure allowed for uniform settlement of the structure and to predict settlement processes during the commissioning of the structure. Clear field data on the settlement of the structure are provided, which have minimal discrepancies with the calculated ones. Such a monitoring approach allows optimizing design solutions, which may reduce the overconsumption of geogrids in reinforced soil structures, and optimizing design parameters, namely the reinforcement pitch and the length of the reinforcing layer, which affects the project cost and labor intensity of the work

Keywords:

reinforced soil structures, geogrids, geosynthetic materials, soil stabilization, strengthening of weak foundations, retaining wall, geomattress

References

  1. McGown, A., & Brown, S.F. (2008). Applications of reinforced soil for transport infrastructure. In Advances in transportation geotechnics (1st ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press. 
  2. Bagui, S.K., Abadin, J., & Bagui, S.S. (2024). Economic and financial analysis for reinforced soil wall in submerged condition. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 21(1), 8-19. doi: 10.17265/1548-6591/2024.01.002.
  3. Jelušič, P., & Žlender, B. (2024). Multi-objective optimization of geosynthetic reinforced soil structures. E3S Web of Conferences, 569, article number 07003. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202456907003.
  4. Dobi, M.D.D. (2011). Internal stability of reinforced soil structures using the two-component wedge method. In Proceedings of the 9th Indonesian geotechnical conference and 15th annual scientific meeting (pp. 1-10). Jakarta.
  5. Terzaghi, K., Peck, R.B., & Mesri, G. (1996). Soil mechanics in engineering practice (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Tensar Corporation. (n.d.). Tensar official website. Retrieved from https://www.tensarcorp.com/.
  7. State Building Norms of Ukraine. (2006). DBN V.1.1-12:2006 Construction in seismic regions of Ukraine. Retrieved from http://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=6614.
  8. State Standard of Ukraine. (1996). DSTU B V.2.1-3-96 Bases and foundations of buildings and structures. Soils. Laboratory tests. Terms. Retrieved from http://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page?id_doc=4079.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2024-116.1-092-101

Address
01010, Ukraine, Kyiv,
1, M. Omelianovycha-Pavlenka Str.


Email
ntu@arrcjournal.org

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving