Article

Received 01.02.2024

Revised 21.05.2024

Accepted 30.06.2024

Retrieved from Iss. 115, P. 2, 2024

Pages 276 -289

Ivko, A. (2024). IMPLEMENTATION ASPECTS ANALYSIS OF SYNCRETIC METHODOLOGY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE RESTORATION PROJECTS. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, (115.2), 276-289. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2024-115.2-276-289

IMPLEMENTATION ASPECTS ANALYSIS OF SYNCRETIC METHODOLOGY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE RESTORATION PROJECTS

Andrii Ivko

The work substantiates the relevance of the syncretic methodology for managing infrastructure restoration projects and investigates the aspects of its implementation that have been carried out. The purpose of the research is set. The available project management methodologies were analyzed, and five typical models of building a corporate project management methodology in the organization were identified. The place and significance of syncretic methodology is outlined. The object of analysis to which the syncretic methodology was applied is described - the Grand portfolio of restoration projects, consisting of projects and portfolios of infrastructure restoration projects. The implemented model of the cyclical process of implementation of management of restoration projects is described. The "system-result" model of the created syncretic methodology of infrastructure restoration project management, which was implemented, is also presented and described. The implementation of the syncretic project management methodology in the context of the implementation of the Grand portfolio of restoration projects was analyzed from organizational, methodological and instrumental aspects. Each such aspect is considered in the perspective of the five directions that are described. According to the results of the analysis, the regularities that were discovered during the implementation, which influenced the adjustment of the models and methods of the syncretic methodology, were formulated. Also given is a SWOT analysis of the implementation of syncretic methodology models and methods in the implementation of projects and portfolios of restoration projects. Prospects for further scientific research in the chosen direction are also determined

infrastructure restoration projects, project and program management, project management methodology, self-managed organization, syncretic methodology
  1. Decree of the President of Ukraine No. 266/2022 of April 21, 2022 "Issues of the National Council for the Recovery of Ukraine from the Consequences of War". (2022). Retrieved from https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/2662022-42225.
  2. Kerzner, H. (2009). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (10th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
  3. Bushuyev, S., & Ivko, A. (2024). Values models identification of syncretic methodology in improvement context in self-managed organizations. Roads and Bridges, 29, 47-57. 
  4. Project Management Institute. (2021). The standard for project management and a guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® guide) (7th ed.). Newtown Square: Project Management Institute.
  5. Project Management Institute. (2017). The standard for program management (4th ed.). Newtown Square: Project Management Institute.
  6. Project Management Institute. (2017). The standard for portfolio management (4th ed.). Newtown Square: Project Management Institute.
  7. Project Management Association of Japan. (2017). P2M Bibelot (Overview of P2M third edition). Retrieved from https://www.pmaj.or.jp/ENG/p2m/p2m_guide/P2M_Bibelot(All)_R3.pdf .
  8. Stellman, A., & Greene, J. (2013). Learning agile: Understanding Scrum, XP, Lean, and Kanban. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
  9. Cockburn, A. (2000). Selecting a project's methodology. IEEE Software, 17(4), 64-71.
  10. Spundak, M. (2014). Mixed agile/traditional project management methodology – reality or illusion? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 939-948.
  11. Bushuyev, S.D., & Kozyr, B.Yu. (2020). Hybridization of methodologies for managing infrastructure projects and programs. Bulletin of the Odessa National Maritime University, 61, 187-207. doi: 10.47049/2226-1893-2020-1-5-26.
  12. Bushuyev, S.D., Kozyr, B.Yu., & Zapryvoda, A.A. (2019). Nonlinear strategies in managing infrastructure programs. Current State of Scientific Research and Technologies in Industry, 4(10), 14-23.
  13. Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing organizations: A guide to creating organizations inspired by the next stage of human consciousness. Brussels: Nelson Parker.
  14. Kinneen, K., & Younas, S. (2018). Self-managing organizations in the context of entrepreneurial innovation. (Master's thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden).
  15. HolacracyOne. (n.d.). Holacracy constitution (Version 5.0). Retrieved from https://www.holacracy.org/constitution/5-0/.
  16. Bushuyev, S., Ivko, A., & Tykhonovych, Yu. (2024). Syncretic project management in the era of artificial intelligence explosion. Environmental Safety and Natural Resources, 49(1), 85-98. 
  17. Plewinski, P. (2014). Design and implementation of a project management methodology: From ad hoc project environment to fully operational PMO in three years. Retrieved from https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/project-management-implementation-office-design-8701.

https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2024-115.2-276-289