• Home
  • Historical notes
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

UkrainianProfessional Education

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 02.11.2023

Revised 25.02.2024

Accepted 27.03.2024

Retrieved from Iss. 115, P. 1, 2024

Pages 12 -24

  • 148 Views

Suggested citation

Dmytrychenko, M., Tokin, O., & Kharchenko, A. (2024). A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO THE EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE FINAL EXAMINATION OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, (115.1), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2024-115.1-012-024

A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO THE EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE FINAL EXAMINATION OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Mykola Dmytrychenko Oleksndr Tokin Anna Kharchenko

Abstract

The article is devoted to the consideration of a topical issue - the application of a systematic approach to the evaluation of the results of the final control of the knowledge of students of higher education at the university. The principles of organization, stages, main tasks and components of knowledge control of higher education seekers were studied, as well as the role of so-called pedagogical control was determined. The taxonomy of pedagogical goals, which determine the process of learning and evaluation of the achieved goals of education, and their relationship with the criteria for evaluating the knowledge of students of higher education at the university are considered. The results of the final control of the autumn examination session of the 2023-2024 academic year and the final certification of 2023 of higher education applicants at the National Transport University were analyzed, as well as their comparison with similar periods of the previous academic year. A study of the reporting of examination commissions was carried out and systematic measures were proposed to improve the quality of the educational process according to educational programs for the next academic year. In particular, it is proposed to continue the practice of considering issues of student success at meetings of academic councils of faculties and departments; to organize round tables to expand the competences of applicants on certain topics and problems with the involvement of specialists and scientists from various organizations; to intensify the publishing activity of higher education applicants; strengthen the work of involving leading specialists, employers, industry experts and practicing professionals in the educational process; to activate the interest of students in learning through the use of combined non-standard methods of learning and teaching; to continue work on the organization of field practices, excursions to enterprises with modern equipment, etc.

Keywords:

final control, assessment of knowledge level, learning outcomes, system approach, quality of the educational process

References

  1. Bakhtiiarova, Kh.Sh., Aristova, A.V., & Volobuev, S.V. (Eds.). (2017). Innovative learning technologies: Textbook for students of higher technical educational institutions. Kyiv: National Transport University.
  2. Dmytrichenko, M.F., Tokin, O.P., & Kharchenko, A.M. (2023). The role of knowledge assessment in ensuring the quality of the university educational process. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, 114(Part 1), 12-23. doi: 10.33744/0365-8171-2023-114.1-012-023.
  3. Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.
  4. Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition. New York: Longman.
  5. Pometun, O., & Hupan, N. (2019). Bloom’s taxonomy and the development of critical thinking in schoolchildren during history lessons. Ukrainian Pedagogical Journal, 3, 50-58. doi: 10.32405/2411-1317-2019-3-50-58.
  6. Proskura, S.L. (2020). Bloom’s taxonomy in assessing the results of students’ educational activity. In Proceedings of the reporting scientific conference of the Institute of Information Technologies and Learning Tools of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine (pp. 83-89). Kyiv, Ukraine: Institute of Information Technologies and Learning Tools of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine.
  7. Odzhubeiiska, O.D., Zubchenko, Yu.P., & Maliuchenko, M.M. (2023). Assessment of knowledge of higher education students in the university. In Proceedings of the Educational and scientific conference with international participation “Medical education under new standards: Challenges and integration into the international educational space” (pp. 185-187). Kyiv, Ukraine.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2024-115.1-012-024

Address
01010, Ukraine, Kyiv,
1, M. Omelianovycha-Pavlenka Str.


Email
ntu@arrcjournal.org

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving