Article

Received 09.04.2023

Revised 17.08.2023

Accepted 20.09.2023

Retrieved from Iss. 114, P. 1, 2023

Pages 12 -23

Dmytrychenko, M., Tokin, O., & Kharchenko, A. (2023). THE ROLE OF KNOWLEDGE CONTROL IN ENSURING THE QUALITY OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS OF THE UNIVERSITY. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, (114.1), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2023-114.1-012-023

THE ROLE OF KNOWLEDGE CONTROL IN ENSURING THE QUALITY OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS OF THE UNIVERSITY

Mykola Dmytrychenko Oleksndr Tokin Anna Kharchenko

The article is devoted to the consideration of an actual issue – determining the role of knowledge control in ensuring the quality of the educational process of the University. The main types and forms of knowledge control of students at the National Transport University were studied. The main functions of control measures as a whole, as well as each type of control separately, are defined. The principles and criteria of checking and evaluating students' knowledge at the university are considered. It was determined that the monitoring of control measures at the university allows for a comprehensive assessment of the level of quality assurance of educational activities. The influence of the systematic evaluation of the results of control measures on the activity of universities and its timely response was considered using the example of the National Transport University. According to the analysis of the role of knowledge control in ensuring the quality of the educational process of the university, the author's strategic planning algorithm was formed, which includes 4 stages of planning measures for the organization of the educational process. A list of measures for the development of the system for ensuring the quality of the educational process in the next academic year has been developed, which include, in particular, the continuation of the practice of considering issues of student success at meetings of academic councils of faculties and departments; organization of round tables to expand the competences of applicants on certain topics and problems with the involvement of specialists and scientists from various organizations; activation of teachers regarding the creation and implementation of distance courses in professional disciplines; measures to strengthen the control of the executive discipline of teachers during current and final control, making up for missed classes, accepting academic debts, measures to strengthen the level of organization and conducting consulting work with students, and others. It is proposed to use the author's algorithm for strategic planning of measures to improve the quality of educational activities of the university

quality of the educational process, control measures, assessment of knowledge level, learning outcomes, algorithm, strategic planning
  1. Iotova, I.M., Madzhar, N.M., & Skalska, S.A. (2018). Control of students' knowledge as a component of the learning process. In Current issues of quality control of education in higher medical educational institutions: Proceedings of the scientific and practical conference with international participation (pp. 104–108). Poltava.
  2. Ortynskyi, V.L. (2009). Pedagogy of higher education: Study guide for students of higher educational institutions. Kyiv: Center for Educational Literature.
  3. Holovenkin, V.P. (2019). Pedagogy of higher education: Textbook (2nd ed.). Kyiv: Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute.
  4. Vytvytska, S.S. (2006). Fundamentals of pedagogy of higher education: Textbook for modular-rating system of learning for master's students. Kyiv: Center for Educational Literature.
  5. Bukhhalo, S.I. (2014). Improvement of methods for assessing students' knowledge in higher educational institutions. Bulletin of the National Technical University "KhPI", 16(1059), 3-11.
  6. Datsenko, V.V., Yehorova, L.M., & Nenastina, T.O. (2020). Modern approaches to organizing student learning control in higher educational institutions. In Modern pedagogue: Collective scientific monograph. Dnipro: Aktsent PP.
  7. Tomasevic, N., Gvozdenovic, N., & Vranes, S. (2020). An overview and comparison of supervised data mining techniques for student exam performance prediction. Computers & Education, 143, article number 103676. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103676.
  8. Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1961-1990.
  9. Robinson, S.E., & Song, J.J. (2019). Student academic performance system: Quantitative approaches to evaluating and monitoring student progress. International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 4(4), 332-353. doi: 10.1504/IJQRE.2019.100170.
  10. Law of Ukraine No. 1556-VII “On Higher Education” (2014, July). Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18.
  11. Bakhtiiarova, Kh.Sh., Aristova, A V., & Volobuieva, S.V. (Eds.). (2017). Innovative learning technologies: Study guide for students of higher technical educational institutions.  Kyiv: National Transport University.
  12. Kanivets, T.M. (2012). Fundamentals of pedagogical assessment: Educational-methodological guide. Nizhyn: PP Lysenko M.M.
  13. Vasylіuk, A., et al. (Eds.). (2019). Quality of higher education: Theory and practice: Educational-methodological guide. Kyiv: National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine.

https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2023-114.1-012-023