• Home
  • Historical notes
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

UkrainianProfessional Education

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 12.02.2025

Revised 03.06.2025

Accepted 24.06.2025

Retrieved from Iss. 117, P. 2, 2025

Pages 312 -329

  • 212 Views

Suggested citation

Onyshchenko, A., Ostroverkh, B., Chyzhenko, N., Aksonov, S., & Moshkivskyi, R. (2025). METHOD OF ASSESSMENT OF LIQUID MASS LEAKAGE IN THE PIPELINE DURING OPERATION. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, (117.2), 312-329. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2025-117.2-312-329

METHOD OF ASSESSMENT OF LIQUID MASS LEAKAGE IN THE PIPELINE DURING OPERATION

Artur Onyshchenko Borys Ostroverkh Nataliia Chyzhenko Sergii Aksonov Roman Moshkivskyi

Abstract

During the development of the documents stipulated by the Law of Ukraine "On Objects of Increased Danger" there was a need to calculate the amount of ammonia that can take part in an emergency situation during an accident on the linear part of the ammonia pipeline. Regulatory documents provide for the consideration of the case of an emergency situation with a guillotine rupture of the pipeline. The total mass of the hazardous substance involved in the accident is calculated as the total mass contained in the linear part of the pipeline between two shut-off devices and the total mass that can be released during the time established to detect the leakage of the substance and implement the closure of the shut-off devices. It is necessary to calculate the mass of ammonia that can be released in the forward and reverse direction during the time established to detect the leakage of the substance and implement the closing of the shut-off devices. The total mass of the hazardous substance after the accident of the section of the ammonia pipeline was determined as the total mass in the linear part of the pipeline between two shut-off devices, and the total mass that can be released during the time established to detect the leakage of the substance and implement the closure of the shut-off devices according to the guillotine gap scheme

Keywords:

ammonia pipeline accidents, guillotine rupture, thermohydrodynamic flow theory, hydraulic approximation

References

  1. Report on research work “Providing recommendations for assessing the mass outflow of liquid ammonia in a pipeline over time”. (2024). Kyiv.
  2. Cleaver, R., et al. (2003). Modelling outflow from a ruptured pipeline transporting compressed volatile liquids. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 16(6), 533-543. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2003.08.004.
  3. Amelina, L.V., et al. (2021). Modeling environmental pollution in case of ammonia emission from a damaged pipeline. Science and Transport Progress. Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport, 1(91). doi: 10.15802/stp2021/229167.
  4. Berlov, O.V. (2016). Atmosphere protection in case of emergency during transportation of dangerous cargo. Science and Transport Progress, 1(61), 48-54. doi: 10.15802/stp2016/60953.
  5. Biliaiev, M.M., & Kharytonov, M.M. (2012). Numerical simulation of indoor air pollution and atmosphere pollution for regions having complex topography. In NATO science for peace and security. Series C: Environmental security (pp. 87-91). Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1359-8_15.
  6. Cao, C., Li, C., Yang, Q., & Zhang, F. (2017). Multi-objective optimization model of emergency organization allocation for sustainable disaster supply chain. Sustainability, 9(11), article number 2103. doi: 10.3390/su9112103.
  7. Naserzadeh, Z., Atabi, F., Moattar, F., & Nejad, N.M. (2017). Effect of barriers on the status of atmospheric pollution by mathematical modeling. Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications, 10(1), 192-204.
  8. Tumanov, A., Gumenyuk, V., & Tumanov, V. (2017). Development of advanced mathematical predictive models for assessing damage avoided accidents on potentially-dangerous sea-based energy facility. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 90, article number 012027. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/90/1/012027.
  9. Cumber, P.S. (2007). Outflow from fractured pipelines transporting supercritical ethylene. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 20(1), 26-37.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2025-117.2-312-329

Address
01010, Ukraine, Kyiv,
1, M. Omelianovycha-Pavlenka Str.


Email
ntu@arrcjournal.org

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving