• Home
  • Historical notes
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

UkrainianProfessional Education

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 12.01.2025

Revised 21.05.2025

Accepted 24.06.2025

Retrieved from Iss. 117, P. 2, 2025

Pages 352 -357

  • 206 Views

Suggested citation

Bakulich, O., & Kriukovska, L. (2025). NTEGRATED SYSTEM OF ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF LINEAR INFRASTRUCTURE OBJECTS. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, (117.2), 352-357. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2025-117.2-352-357

NTEGRATED SYSTEM OF ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF LINEAR INFRASTRUCTURE OBJECTS

Olena Bakulich Lesia Kriukovska

Abstract

The current development of transport infrastructure lays the foundation for increased requirements related to ensuring environmental safety and mitigating negative impacts on the environment. Research into highway design practices has revealed shortcomings inherent in conventional environmental assessment methods, which typically focus on individual aspects of impact. Road infrastructure is a multifaceted system that includes not only asphalt and earthen surfaces, but also related structures that perform hydraulic functions. Elements such as bridge crossings, culverts, drainage systems, and other hydrological components pose specific environmental risks that require independent assessment. A review of current methodological approaches has revealed significant shortcomings in the separate consideration of transport and hydraulic infrastructure. Established methodologies, including life cycle assessment, environmental impact assessment, and multi-criteria decision analysis, do not adequately consider the systemic interactions, synergistic effects, and cumulative impacts associated with complex infrastructure initiatives. This study aims to formulate an integrated system for the environmental assessment of linear infrastructure projects based on the principles of systematicity, comprehensiveness, and dynamism. The proposed modular structure consists of separate components for assessing transport and hydraulic infrastructure, an analytical module for studying systemic interactions, and an integration module for consolidating conclusions. The practical implementation of the developed methodology guarantees more reliable conclusions regarding the environmental safety of projects, optimization of project decisions to mitigate negative consequences, and compliance with environmental legislation

Keywords:

environmental impact assessment; infrastructure projects; transport infrastructure; hydraulic structures; integrated methodology; environmental safety

References

  1. Picardo, A., Soltero, V.M., & Peralta, E. (2023). Life cycle assessment of sustainable road networks: Current state and future directions. Buildings, 13(10), article number 2648. doi: 10.3390/buildings13102648.
  2. United Nations Development Programme. (2025). Ukraine – fourth rapid damage and needs assessment (RDNA4): February 2022 – December 2024. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/ukraine/publications/ukraine-fourth-rapid-damage-and-needs-assessment-rdna4-february-2022-december-2024-english.
  3. Conflict and Environment Observatory. (2024). Environmental assessment. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/report/ukraine/assessing-environmental-damage-ukraine-february-2024.
  4. Vijayakumar, A., Mahmood, M.N., & Gurmu, A. (2024). Social sustainability assessment of road infrastructure: A systematic literature review. Quality and Quantity, 58, 1039-1069. doi: 10.1007/s11135-023-01683-y.
  5. Kahangirwe, P., Vanclay, F., & Arts, J. (2024). Using environmental and social impact assessment to improve tourism infrastructure projects in protected areas: Green tourism in the Kalinzu Central Forest Reserve in Uganda. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 0(0), 1-24.
  6. Muhammad, G., Zheng, Y., Khaled, A., & Raja, B. (2025). Factors influencing performance, durability, and environmental impact of hydraulic structures using waste composite. Civil Engineering Journal, 11, 2536-2559. doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2025-011-06-021.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2025-117.2-352-357

Address
01010, Ukraine, Kyiv,
1, M. Omelianovycha-Pavlenka Str.


Email
ntu@arrcjournal.org

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving