• Home
  • Historical notes
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

UkrainianProfessional Education

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 24.10.2024

Revised 27.02.2025

Accepted 29.03.2025

Retrieved from Iss. 117, P. 1, 2025

Pages 209 -220

  • 208 Views

Suggested citation

Chernenko, Yu., Bedrii, D., & Semko, I. (2025). ASSESSING INNOVATION READINESS IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: A COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF THE IRI METHODOLOGY. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, (117.1), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2025-117.1-209-220

ASSESSING INNOVATION READINESS IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: A COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF THE IRI METHODOLOGY

Yuri Chernenko Dmytro Bedrii Inga Semko

Abstract

This study introduces the innovation readiness index (iri), a structured framework for evaluating an organization’s capacity for innovation in engineering projects by integrating financial feasibility, effectiveness, and risk. A mixed-methods strategy was employed at Mastergaz, a leading IT engineering company. Data from 30 project stakeholders were gathered via quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews and analyzed for correlation with key project outcomes. Results show a strong positive relationship between higher IRI scores and enhanced project performance, including better completion rates and heightened stakeholder satisfaction. The average IRI score of 6.8, coupled with a Pearson correlation of 0.75, indicates that projects with stronger innovation readiness are more likely to succeed. The study also demonstrates the IRI’s adaptability across various industries. Implementing a structured, multi-dimensional readiness index can guide resource allocation, improve stakeholder engagement, and facilitate data-driven decision-making in project management. This research advances current understanding of innovation readiness by introducing a comprehensive model that incorporates financial, operational, and risk considerations. Future work includes validating the IRI in different organizational settings and expanding its criteria to capture broader stakeholder dimensions

Keywords:

innovation readiness, project management, risk management, stakeholder engagement, performance metrics, financial feasibility, customer satisfaction

References

  1. Sercan, O., Stornelli, A., & Simms, C. (2024). A product innovation readiness level framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71(4), 9920-9937. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2023.3312595.
  2. Boanță, L., Marin, A., Zapciu, M., & Rânea, B.-G. (2023). Commercial readiness index for Littar® asphalt concrete. Towards Increased Business Resilience. doi: 10.56177/11icmie2023.22.
  3. Penny, J., Dlugoborskyte, V., Draper, K., Fonseca, A., Baker, K., Chen, A.S., Manojlovic, N., & Vojinovic, Z. (2024). Innovating nature-based solutions: Learnings from the EU Horizon 2020 RECONECT project. Blue-Green Systems. doi: 10.2166/bgs.2024.048.
  4. Lunner, C., Worrmann, E., & Sundström, P. (2018). Introducing innovation readiness levels – a framework to evaluate innovation efforts. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
  5. Blut, M., & Wang, C. (2019). Technology readiness: A meta-analysis of conceptualizations of the construct and its impact on technology usage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(3), 649-669. doi: 10.1007/S11747-019-00680-8.
  6. Biloskurskyi, R. (2022). Agile methodology of implementation of ERP information systems. Scientific Opinion: Economics and Management. doi: 10.32836/2521-666x/2022-77-12.
  7. Oksamytna, L., & Praha, R. (2022). Features of modern ERP-systems for business process management of the enterprise. Management of Development of Complex Systems. doi: 10.32837/2412-9933.2022.51.31-40.
  8. Srivastava, D., & Batra, A. (2020). ERP systems. New Delhi: I K International Publishing House.
  9. Wijaya, S., Egeten, A.E., & Wiratama, J. (2024). Development of open source big data technology using project management to address complexity in ERP implementation. In 2024 5th international conference on big data analytics and practices (IBDAP) (pp. 6-11). doi: 10.1109/IBDAP62940.2024.10689692.
  10. Sartas, M., Schut, M., Proietti, C., Thiele, G., & Leeuwis, C. (2020). Scaling readiness: Science and practice of an approach to enhance impact of research for development. Agricultural Systems, 183, article number 102874. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102874.
  11. Domlyn, A.M., & Wandersman, A. (2019). Community coalition readiness for implementing something new: Using a Delphi methodology. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(4), 882-897. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22161.
  12. Galvez, D., Enjolras, M., Camargo, M., Boly, V., & Claire, J. (2018). Firm readiness level for innovation projects: A new decision-making tool for innovation managers. Administrative Sciences, 8(1), article number 6. doi; 10.3390/ADMSCI8010006.
  13. Taganoviq, B., et al. (2023). Psychometric assessment of organizational readiness scale for digital innovations. Human Systems Management. doi: 10.3233/hsm-220202.
  14. Eljasik-Swoboda, T., Rathgeber, C., & Hasenauer, R. (2019). Assessing technology readiness for artificial intelligence and machine learning-based innovations. In Proceedings of the 11th international joint conference on knowledge discovery, knowledge engineering and knowledge management (pp. 281-288). doi: 10.5220/0007946802810288.
  15. Cheng, M., Cheung, C., Tsui, E., & Wan, K. L. (2018). Readiness analysis of open innovation – a self-assessment method. International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science, 9(4), 16-44. doi: 10.4018/IJKSS.2018100102.
  16. Nasrollahi, M., & Ramezani, J. (2020). A model to evaluate the organizational readiness for big data adoption. International Journal of Computers, Communications & Control, 15(3). doi: 10.15837/ijccc.2020.3.3874.
  17. Ariansyah, K., Setiawan, A.B., & Hikmaturokhman, A. (2024). Big data readiness in the public sector: An assessment model and insights from Indonesian local governments. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. doi: 10.1108/jstpm-01-2023-0010.
  18. Benson, T. (2019). Digital innovation evaluation: User perceptions of innovation readiness, digital confidence, innovation adoption, user experience and behaviour change. BMJ Health & Care Informatics, 26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-000018.
  19. Lokuge, S., Sedera, D., Grover, V., & Xu, D. (2019). Organizational readiness for digital innovation: Development and empirical calibration of a construct. Information & Management, 56(3), 445-461. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2018.09.001.
  20. Leonard, E., De Kock, I.H., & Bam, W. (2019). The development of a healthcare innovation adoption readiness assessment tool (HIARAT). South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 30(1). doi: 10.7166/30-1-2013.
  21. Akunyumu, S., Fugar, F., Adinyira, E., & Danku, J. (2020). A review of models for assessing readiness of construction organisations to innovate. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management. doi: 10.1108/ci-01-2020-0014.
  22. Kampa, R.K. (2023). Combining technology readiness and acceptance model for investigating the acceptance of m-learning in higher education in India. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. doi: 10.1108/aaouj-10-2022-0149.
  23. Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Yang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2020). Critical success factors of green innovation: Technology, organization and environment readiness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, article number 121701. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121701.
  24. Watson, R., Wilson, H., Smart, P., & Macdonald, E. K. (2018). Harnessing difference: A capability-based framework for stakeholder engagement in environmental innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(3), 254-279. doi: 10.1111/JPIM.12394.
  25. Grama-Vigouroux, S., Saidi, S., Berthinier-Poncet, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Madanamoothoo, A. (2020). From closed to open: A comparative stakeholder approach for developing open innovation activities in SMEs. Journal of Business Research. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.016.
  26. Leonidou, E., Christofi, M., Vrontis, D., & Thrassou, A. (2020). An integrative framework of stakeholder engagement for innovation management and entrepreneurship development. Journal of Business Research, 119, 245-258. doi: 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2018.11.054.
  27. Van den Hoed, M., Backhaus, R., Beaulen, A., Hamers, J., & Daniels, R. (2023). Development of an evidence-based framework for innovation readiness of long-term care organizations. Innovation in Aging, 7(1019). doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad104.3275.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2025-117.1-209-220

Address
01010, Ukraine, Kyiv,
1, M. Omelianovycha-Pavlenka Str.


Email
ntu@arrcjournal.org

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving