Article

Received 11.04.2024

Revised 03.09.2024

Accepted 27.09.2024

Retrieved from Iss. 116, P. 1, 2024

Pages 71 -80

Gameliak, I., Kharchenko, A., & Dmytrychenko, A. (2024). ANALYSIS OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE DEGREE OF DAMAGE TO CEMENT CONCRETE SURFACES OF ROADS AND AIRPORTS. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, (116.1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2024-116.1-071-080

ANALYSIS OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE DEGREE OF DAMAGE TO CEMENT CONCRETE SURFACES OF ROADS AND AIRPORTS

Igor Gameliak Anna Kharchenko Andrii Dmytrychenko

The article considers modern methods for assessing the degree of damage to cement concrete pavements of highways and airfields. An analysis of traditional and innovative approaches is carried out, their effectiveness, accuracy and feasibility of use in various operating conditions are considered. Detection of defects in cement concrete pavement is an important stage in the process of operation and repair of cement concrete pavement structures. Timely detection of damage allows you to prevent further destruction and ensure operational safety. An analysis of methods for assessing the condition of airfield pavements is carried out: Present Serviceability Index (PSI), Present Serviceability Rating (PSR),. ACR-PCR method, hard pavement preservation index MJ. The advantages and disadvantages of the methods are indicated.
 

analysis, factors, methods, damage, cement concrete pavements, assessment of the condition of airfield pavements, advantages and disadvantages, PSI (Present Serviceability Index) methods, Present Serviceability Rating (PSR),. ACR-PCR method, hard pavement preservation index MJ
  1. State Building Norms of Ukraine. (2000). DSTU B V.2.3-4:2000 Highways. Methods for determining pavement strength. Kyiv: State Committee for Construction, Architecture and Housing Policy of Ukraine.
  2. State Building Norms of Ukraine. (2000). DSTU B V.2.3-3-2000 (GOST 30412-96) Roads and airfields. Methods for measuring unevenness of bases and pavements (Effective February 23, 2000). Kyiv: State Committee for Construction, Architecture and Housing Policy of Ukraine.
  3. ASTM International. (2008). ASTM D6087-08 Standard test method for evaluating asphalt-covered concrete bridge decks using ground penetrating radar. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
  4. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2004). AASHTO R 36-04 Evaluating faulting of concrete pavements by meters. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
  5. Hameliak, I.P., Dmytrychenko, A.M., & Raikovskyi, V.F. (2023). Improvement of the methodology for assessing the condition of airfield pavement. Airport Planning, Construction and Maintenance Journal, 2, 20-32. 
  6. Hameliak, I.P., & Raikovskyi, V.F. (2024). Comprehensive assessment of road pavement condition. Roads and Bridges, 30, 122-137. doi: 10.36100/dorogimosti2024.30.122.
  7. Ministry of Defense of Ukraine. (2013). Instructions for the operation of airfields of state aviation of Ukraine (Order No. 441, July 1, 2013). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1229-13.
  8. State Construction Norms of the USSR. (1985). SNiP 2.05.08-85 Airfields. Moscow: State Committee for Construction of the USSR.
  9. Ministry of Regional Development, Construction and Housing and Communal Services of Ukraine. (2022). DBN V.2.2-XX:2022 Buildings and structures. Airfields. Part I. Design. Part II. Construction. Retrieved from https://nau.edu.ua/site/variables/news/2022/Аеродроми.pdf.

https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2024-116.1-071-080