Article

Received 26.12.2023

Revised 24.05.2024

Accepted 30.06.2024

Retrieved from Iss. 115, P. 2, 2024

Pages 290 -299

Dmytrychenko, A., Alieksieienko, O., & Artemchuk, Yu. (2024). SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE TERMINOLOGICAL APPARATUS OF RISKOLOGY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ACTIVITIES OF A MOTOR TRANSPORT ENTERPRISE. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, (115.2), 290-299. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2024-115.2-290-299

SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE TERMINOLOGICAL APPARATUS OF RISKOLOGY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ACTIVITIES OF A MOTOR TRANSPORT ENTERPRISE

Andrii Dmytrychenko Oleksandr Alieksieienko Yuliia Artemchuk

The study determined that in the context of the functioning of transport industry enterprises in modern conditions, researchers and scientists are increasingly resorting to the use of risk-oriented or riskbased management apparatus. However, the terminological apparatus of risk management must be carefully studied and systematized, in connection with which it is proposed to apply the approaches of system analysis to the development of the conceptual apparatus of riskology. The main concepts and tools of risk management are presented. In particular, a set of methods and models for their evaluation, analysis of factors, selection of a management strategy, control (monitoring) and evaluation of the results of ISO 9001:2015 risk management, as well as the approach of applying the Ishikawa diagram. Risk management methods are classified into two classes, which are based on quantitative and qualitative risk analysis and on graphic analysis, methods of static analysis and mathematical modeling. It is noted that the analysis of project risks should take into account their main indicators, such as: risk factors; significance of risk consequences (weight); probability of occurrence of a risky situation. The main methods of quantitative and qualitative risk analysis are described. An own concept of the formation of risk management terminology is proposed, depending on the meaning attached to solving certain tasks of the organization and its branch affiliation

system analysis, risk, risk management, risk-oriented thinking, risk-oriented approach, transport industry
  1. Great Ukrainian Encyclopedia. (n.d.). Motor transport enterprise. Retrieved from https://vue.gov.ua/Автотранспортне_підприємство.
  2. DSTU ISO 9001:2015 (ISO 9001:2015, IDT). (2016). Quality management systems. Requirements. Kyiv: Ukrainian Scientific and Technical Center of Standardization.
  3. Mushnikova, S.A. (2019). Risk-oriented thinking as the basic foundation of innovativeness of the enterprise development safety management system. Economic Bulletin, 4, 93-101. doi: 10.33271/ev/68.093.12.
  4. Danilova, E.I. (2018). Methodology of risk-oriented approach to enterprise economic security management. Modern Economics, 12, 61-68.
  5. Bodnarash, S.I., & Teslenko, P.O. (2017). Risk-oriented project management of Green Campus. In Project, program, portfolio management. P3M (Vol. 3, pp. 106-109). Kyiv: ICS ONPU.
  6. Dudneva, Yu., & Zaiceva, A. (2023). Risk-oriented enterprise management under conditions of external context uncertainty. Adaptive Management: Theory and Practice. Series Economics, 15(30). doi: 10.33296/2707-0654-15(30)-10.
  7. Herasymenko, O.M. (2021). Risk-oriented management in the enterprise economic security system. (Doctoral dissertation, University "KROK", Kyiv, Ukraine).
  8. Zanora, V.O., & Voitko, S.V. (2017). Enterprise management: Planning technological costs, risk management, motivation, decision-making. Kyiv: Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute.
  9. Xenidis, Y., & Angelides, D.C. (2013). A risk-based decision making methodology for planning and operating safe infrastructure systems against various hazards. In Computational methods in earthquake engineering (p. 591).
  10. Lamine, E., Thabet, R., Sienou, A., Bork, D., Fontanili, F., & Pingaud, H. (2020). BPRIM: An integrated framework for business process management and risk management. Computers in Industry, 117, article number 103199.
  11. Burges, D. (2012). Cargo theft, loss prevention, and supply chain management. Waltham: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  12. Mayhew, C. (2001). The detection and prevention of cargo theft. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 214, 1-6.
  13. Petrashevskyi, O.L., Aleksieienko, O.V., Danylevskyi, V.V., & Tsymbal, N.N. (2011). Structure and planning of research and development work in transport. In Market of services of complex transport systems and applied problems of logistics: Proceedings of the 13th international sientific-practical conference (pp. 157-164). Kyiv.
  14. Wikipedia. (n.d.). Ishikawa diagram. Retrieved from https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Діаграма_Ішікави.
  15. Kalabukhova, S. (2022). Analytical procedures of financial monitoring of audit entities. Retrieved from https://www.apu.com.ua/2022/06/13/відбулась-веб-дискусія-аналітичні-п/.
  16. Shvornikova, H.M., & Soroka, S.I. (2021). Project risks of transport infrastructure development. Bulletin of Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University, 4(268), 112-117. doi: 10.33216/1998-7927-2021-268-4-112-117.
  17. Melenchuk, V.M. (2018). Models and methods of risk management for material and technical support projects of automotive units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. (PhD dissertation, Lviv State University of Life Safety, Lviv, Ukraine). 
  18. Kharuta, V., Marunich, V., Kharuta, V., & Hryhorevska, M. (2021). Strategic project management of transport industry enterprises. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 45, 57-65. doi: 10.32347/2412-9933.2021.45.57-65.

https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2024-115.2-290-299