Article

Received 22.12.2022

Revised 10.05.2023

Accepted 14.06.2023

Retrieved from Iss. 113, P. 2, 2023

Pages 141 -155

Gameliak, I., & Dmytrychenko, A. (2023). AIRFIELD PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF TECHNICAL AND OPERATING FACILITY. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, (113.2), 141-155. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2023-113.2-141-155

AIRFIELD PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF TECHNICAL AND OPERATING FACILITY

Igor Gameliak Andrii Dmytrychenko

The article explores an overview of APMS to understand its successful implementation. Once an airport pavement has been opened to traffic, proper maintenance and rehabilitation work is essential to maintain the pavement's functionality at a satisfactory level and extend its service life. Maintenance and restoration-reconstruction strategies were tentatively based on the empirical and subjective judgments of airport administration employees. This required a systematic method of performing maintenance and restoration-reconstruction works, i.e. the Airport Pavement Management System (APMS). Some APMS subsystems have been developed through the exchange of ideas, information and resources and are entering practical use. Based on various airport pavement studies, such as surface condition assessment studies, structural evaluations, failure and serviceability predictions, and maintenance and rehabilitation strategies, design, assessment and rehabilitation procedures have been developed that form the subsystems of the complete APMS. The maintenance and recovery subsystem of the airport pavement management system consists of three phases: the inspection and maintenance phase, the reliability evaluation phase, and the recovery optimization phase

airport pavement management system, airport pavements, maintenance, construction design, software, indicators of surface condition
  1. HDM-4 Technical User Guide. Part C: Analysis Tools. C-3 Strategy Analysis. (1998). Retrieved from http://www.asphaltwa.com/wapa_web/modules/08_evaluation/08_management.htm#pms.
  2. Fourth Highway Development and Management Model (HDM-4) road use costs model documentation. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/793271468171847482/Fourth-Highway-Development-and-Management-Model-HDM-4-road-use-costs-model-documentation.
  3. Kyzyma, S.S., Kanin, O.P., Lykhostup, M.M., & Andreev, S.I. (2001). General characteristics of the Ukrainian system for managing the condition of flexible road pavements. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, 62, 76-80.
  4. Kyzyma, S.S., & Lykhostup, M.M. (2002). Recommendations for using the road condition management system for planning repair works. Kyiv: Ukravtodor.
  5. Kanin, O.P., Sokolova, N.M., & Kharchenko, A.M. (2016). Information-analytical system for road management based on web technology. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, 95, 129-142.
  6. Kharchenko, A.M., Kanin, O.P., & Sokolova, N.M. (2013). Road condition management system based on level of service indicator in long-term contracts for routine minor repairs and road maintenance. Project Management, Systems Analysis and Logistics. Technical Series, 195-207.
  7. Di Mascio, P., & Moretti, L. (2019). Implementation of a pavement management system for maintenance and rehabilitation of airport surfaces. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 11, article number e00251.
  8. Qabaja, M., & Labeedi, A. (2020). An investigation of the airport pavement management system (APMS). International Journal of Advanced Engineering Sciences and Applications, 1(1), 27-33.
  9. Tighe, S.L., & Covalt, M. (2008). Implementation of an airport pavement management system. Transportation Research Circular, E-C127.
  10. Broten, M., Comer, C., & Muntasir, A. (2004). State airport pavement management practices and the impact on pavement condition. In 6th International conference on managing pavements. Queensland.
  11. Rahman, M.M. (2013). Alternatives to PCI and MicroPAVER based maintenance solutions for airport pavements. (Master's thesis, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, Mexica).
  12. Chai, G., Bartlett, R., Kelly, G., & Yang, L. (2016). Model for benchmarking pavement maintenance budget for sustainable road transport infrastructure. In Geotechnical special publication, Geo-China (pp. 180-187). Shandong.
  13. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (1993). AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures. Washington: AASHTO.
  14. Federal Aviation Administration. (2014). Airport pavement management program (PMP) (Advisory Circular 150/5380-7B). Washington: FAA.
  15. Hachiya, Y., Watanabe, T., & Kitaochi, K. (n.d.). Quantification of changes in surface conditions of airport pavements in Japan. Retrieved from http://ssms.jp/img/files/2019/04/sms10_104.pdf.
  16. de Oliveira, S.G., Tibaut, A., & Dell’Acqua, G. (2019). Airport pavement management systems: An open BIM approach. In Proceedings of the International symposium on asphalt pavement & environment (pp. 450-459). Padua.
  17. Hameliak, I.P., Dmytrychenko, A.M., & Raikovskyi, V.F. (2022). Improvement of the methodology for assessing the condition of airfield pavement. In Proceedings of the X world congress “Aviation in the 21st century – safety in aviation and space technologies” (pp. 9.1.15-9.1.20). Kyiv: National Aviation University.
  18. International Civil Aviation Organization. (2002). Airport services manual. Part 2: Pavement surface conditions. Montreal: ICAO.
  19. Federal Aviation Administration. (2014). Standardized method of reporting airport pavement strength – PCN (Advisory Circular 150/5335-5C). Washington: FAA.
  20. Dynatest. (2014). Dynatest FWD/HWD test systems: Owners manual. Søborg: Dynatest.
  21. ASTM International. (2008). Standard practice for computing international roughness index of roads from longitudinal profile measurements (ASTM E1926-08). West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
  22. International Civil Aviation Organization. (2013). Annex 14 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation: Volume I – aerodromes. Montreal: ICAO.
  23. ASTM International. (2005). Standard test method for measuring rut-depth of pavement surfaces using a straightedge (ASTM E1703/M-95). West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
  24. Barbarella, M., D’Amico, F., De Blasiis, M.R., Di Benedetto, A., & Fiani, M. (2018). Use of terrestrial laser scanner for rigid airport pavement management. Sensors, 18(10), article number 3579.
  25. Federal Aviation Administration. (2016). Measurement, construction, and maintenance of skid-resistant airport pavement surfaces (Advisory Circular 150/5320-12C). Washington: FAA.
  26. Italian Civil Aviation Authority. (2014). Criteria for the evaluation of runway surface conditions (APT 10 30/10/14). Rome: ENAC.

https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2023-113.2-141-155