• Home
  • Historical notes
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

UkrainianProfessional Education

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 23.03.2025

Revised 18.08.2025

Accepted 30.09.2025

Retrieved from Iss. 118, P. 1, 2025

Pages 244 -251

  • 211 Views

Suggested citation

Dziuba, O., Boyko, V., & Oleshko, O. (2025). METHODOLOGICAL BASIS OF FORMING INNOVATION STRATEGIES IN ENTERPRISES. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, (118.1), 244-251. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2025-118.1-244-251

METHODOLOGICAL BASIS OF FORMING INNOVATION STRATEGIES IN ENTERPRISES

Oksana Dziuba Victoria Boyko Oleg Oleshko

Abstract

In current conditions of globalization and fierce competition the introduction of innovations becomes a key factor in the success and sustainable development of enterprises. An innovative strategy allows companies systematically approach the renewal of products, processes, technologies and business models. The general innovation strategy consists of a consequent step to ensure effective innovative activity of the enterprise, considering the general strategy in conditions of limited resources and the influence of the external environment. Innovative strategies that a company can develop are based on strategic alternatives: constrained growth or growth. In general, the innovation strategy has a lot common with the general strategy of the company and includes either strengthening the position of the company in the selected market segment of a certain industry or active diversification of activities. The main difference between the general strategies and innovative strategies is that the innovative strategy necessarily includes an element of innovation. The primary task in the process of forming an innovation strategy is to define the goals and tasks of innovation activity. It is important for each enterprise to form an individual strategy that depends on the level of product innovation and the type of introduced innovation. While systematizing the existing approaches for the implementation stages of innovation strategy, the following steps were identified in the study: formation of goals and tasks of innovation activity; analysis of the internal and external environment; development of innovative strategy of the enterprise; long-term innovative forecasting based on roadmapping; determination of the necessary resources for innovative activity of enterprise; control over the implementation of the innovation strategy and adjustments if necessary; determination innovative strategy’s impact for the economic development of the enterprise. The steps of forming a strategic roadmap are compatible with the corresponding stages of the strategy and are closely intertwined, which makes their integration into the stages of creating an innovative strategy justified to avoid actions duplication. The unicity and advantage of a strategy map is the use of a timestructured (and often graphical) base for developing, presenting and communicating strategic plans considering technologies’ evolution, products and markets. One of the most important advantages of this approach is communication via functional and organizational connections

Keywords:

strategy, development, innovation, enterprise, strategic map, balanced indicators

References

  1. Porter, M.E. (1997). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Kyiv: Osnovy.
  2. Korzenkov, D.Ye. (2011). Main requirements for forming a system of strategic enterprise management. Academic Review, 1(34), 83-88.
  3. Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  4. Fedulova, I.V. (2010). Strategic directions of development of innovative potential of industrial enterprises. Scientific Bulletin of Lesia Ukrainka SNU. Economic Sciences, 5, 65-70.
  5. Orlova, V.M. (2015). Strategy of innovative development of the enterprise. Economic Nobel Bulletin, 1, 79-85.
  6. Nekrasova, L.A., & Monich, O.V. (2014). Mechanism for developing a strategy of innovative-investment development of the enterprise. Strategy of Development of Ukraine. Economics, Sociology, Law, 1, 159-163. 
  7. Illiashenko, N.S., Stupnikova, K.B., & Kyryllova, A.M. (2018). Conceptual foundations of the mechanism for forming strategies of leading innovative acceleration of industrial enterprises. Efficient Economy, 4, 208-215.
  8. Oliinyk, L.V. (2017). Management of innovative development of the enterprise based on the formation of innovative programs. Economics and Organization of Management, 3, 51-59. 
  9. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
  10. Yankovets, T.M. (2012). Implementation of innovative strategies to achieve competitive advantages. Problems of Science, 12, 33-40.
  11. Chaffee, E. (1985). Three models of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 89-98.
  12. Dissel, M. (2010). Value roadmapping. Research Technology Management, 6, 28-30.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2025-118.1-244-251

Address
01010, Ukraine, Kyiv,
1, M. Omelianovycha-Pavlenka Str.


Email
ntu@arrcjournal.org

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving