Article

Received 15.10.2024

Revised 01.03.2025

Accepted 29.03.2025

Retrieved from Iss. 117, P. 1, 2025

Pages 132 -138

Kasyanov, V., Mamonov, K., Radzinska, Yu., & Zheltobriukh, A. (2025). IMPROVEMENT OF MONITORING PROCESSES OF CONSTRUCTION OBJECTS USING GEODETIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, (117.1), 132-138. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2025-117.1-132-138

IMPROVEMENT OF MONITORING PROCESSES OF CONSTRUCTION OBJECTS USING GEODETIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Vladimir Kasyanov Kostiantyn Mamonov Yuliia Radzinska Andrii Zheltobriukh

The relevance of the study is determined. Monitoring is characterized by a system of formation of complete, reliable information about the technical condition of construction objects, which is due to spatial, urban planning, environmental parameters, modern geodetic, geoinformation and other systems are used to implement monitoring procedures. The purpose of the study has been achieved to characterize the monitoring processes of construction objects for the use of geodetic information systems. To achieve this goal, the task is solved: justification of the geodetic information system; tools for implementing a geodetic information system. The use of geodetic information systems in construction allows to ensure the accuracy of work, increase the efficiency of project management and reduce risks. Integration with modern technologies (such as BIM and GNSS) opens up new opportunities to coordinate project participants, monitor tasks and optimize resources. Characterizing the practical aspects of the geodetic information system, it is determined that geodetic monitoring of the construction object was made using modern equipment, such as an electronic tacheometer South NTS 352 RL, provided a high -precision analysis of the state of structural elements of the building. Due to the introduction of BIM technologies, the results of geodetic measurements are integrated into a digital system, which allowed to create a three-dimensional model of the object, to carry out a detailed analysis of changes in the geometry of structures and to evaluate the degree of damage. The use of BIM technologies has allowed to effectively integrate all geodetic data and turn them into a virtual model of the building, which made it possible to create an accurate and detailed display of the object, which included several important elements: the position of rogels at the levels of floors, which allowed them to clearly visualize their condition and detected deviation; details of damaged structures, including deformations that were the result of the explosion; The geometry of the facade walls, which was built taking into account the vertical abnormalities and deformities that arose from the destruction. This process, through the integration of different data into a single virtual model, makes the model as realistic and accurate as possible. This approach is extremely important for further assessment of potential threats or determining the extent of the necessary repair work. The virtual model not only visualizes the building, but also forecasts for its further restoration and optimization of the project

monitoring, construction objects, geodetic information systems, geodetic monitoring, land use
  1. Luchko, I.I., Koval, P.M., & Demian, M.L. (2001). Methods of research and testing of building materials and structures. Lviv: Kamenar.
  2. Poproug, D.V., & Valovoy, O.I. (2013). Problems of monitoring the technical condition of buildings and structures. Bulletin of Kryvyi Rih National University, 34, 186-190.
  3. Trikoz, L.V., & Yurchenko, R.V. (2021). Systematization of defects of reinforced concrete bridges of Ukraine on the results of their survey. Collection of Scientific Works of the Ukrainian State University of Railway Transport, 197, 18-28.
  4. Shatov, S.V., & Bogachenko, S.V. (2023). Analysis of methods of monitoring the technical condition of building structures and legislative and regulatory documents. Ukrainian Journal of Construction and Architecture, 6, 136-142.
  5. Mcrae, J.B., & Simmonds, T. (1991). Long-term stability of vibrating wire instruments: One manufacturer's perspective. In Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on field measurements in geomechanics (FMGM). (pp. 283-293). Oslo: Norwegian Geotechnical Institute.
  6. State Standard of Ukraine. (2017). DSTU-N B B.1.2-18:2016. Guidelines for inspection of buildings and structures to determine and evaluate their technical condition. Kyiv: SE Research Institute of Construction Production.
  7. Longley, P., Goodchild, M., Maguire, D., & Rhind, D. (2015). Geographic Information Science and Systems. Hoboken: Wiley.
  8. Dyachun, V.P., & Shishkin, S.V. (2017). Geoinformation systems and their application in environmental monitoring. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 2(5).
  9. Yermakov, O.V. (2018). The role of geoinformation systems in improving the efficiency of construction management. Technologies of the future. Kyiv.
  10. Goncharenko, V.M., & Sidorenko, L.A. (2018). The role of high-precision GPS-receivers and tachometers in the creation of geospatial models. Modern Technologies in Geodesy and Cartography.

https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2025-117.1-132-138