• Home
  • Historical notes
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

UkrainianProfessional Education

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 07.10.2023

Revised 28.02.2024

Accepted 27.03.2024

Retrieved from Iss. 115, P. 1, 2024

Pages 25 -34

  • 175 Views

Suggested citation

Medvediev, K., Yevseichyk, Yu., Yanchuk, L., Parovenko, O., & Kozachenko, K. (2024). DETERMINING STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY CONSIDERING THE ASYMMETRY OF DISTRIBUTION LAWS. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, (115.1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2024-115.1-025-034

DETERMINING STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY CONSIDERING THE ASYMMETRY OF DISTRIBUTION LAWS

Kostiantyn Medvediev Yurii Yevseichyk Leonid Yanchuk Oksana Parovenko Kateryna Kozachenko

Abstract

In the calculations of structural reliability, it is mainly considered that the laws of distribution of random values of resistance and load effect obey the normal law (Gauss’s law). This law is convenient to use and the most widespread. Therefore, it has found wide application in reliability theory for solving most problems. The law of distribution is symmetric, that is, random variables are distributed symmetrically relative to its center (mathematical expectation). But, as experimental studies show, both the material resistence and the load effect on the structure in most cases are subject to asymmetric laws. The asymmetry of the material resistance can be neglected in most practical cases, but failure to take into account the asymmetry of the load effect can lead to significant errors in determining structural reliability. The authors chose two laws with different degrees of positive asymmetry to approximate the load distribution, namely gamma and lognormal laws. The normal (symmetric) law was used for the resistence distribution law. The results of reliability calculations that take into account different load distribution laws are presented in the form of a table and a graph. The graph shows the dependence of structural reliability on the reliability index for symmetric (PN) and asymmetric (PNG, PNL) laws. All calculations were performed using the Mathcad complex, which allows calculating values with sufficient accuracy. The issue of how to choose the distribution law for the load effect obviously depends on the operation mode of a particular bridge and should be based on appropriate statistical studies. The purpose of this paper is to show the need for taking into account the law of asymmetry in order to determine the structural reliability. Eurocode norms also require to take into account the asymmetry of distribution laws

Keywords:

structural reliability, normal distribution law, safety factor, asymmetric distribution laws, reliability index

References

  1. Yu, Y. (2017). An enhanced bridge weigh-in-motion methodology and a Bayesian framework for predicting extreme traffic load effects of bridges. (Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, USA).
  2. Wang, X., Ruan, X., Casas, J. R., & Zhang, M. (2024). Probabilistic model of traffic scenarios for extreme load effects. Structural Safety, 106, article number 102382. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2023.102382.
  3. Braml, T., & Kainz, C. (2022). Practical concepts for the use of probabilistic methods in the structural analysis and reassessment of existing bridges – presentation of latest research and implementation. Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings, 36, 47-58. doi: 10.14311/APP.2022.36.0047.
  4. Pichugin, S.F. (2016). Calculation of the reliability of building structures. Poltava: ASMI LLC.
  5. DSTU-N B EN 1990:2002 (EN 1990:2002, IDT). (2013). Eurocode 0. Basis of structural design. Kyiv: Ministry of Regional Development, Construction and Housing and Communal Services of Ukraine.
  6. Rzhanitsyn, A.R. (1978). Theory of calculation of building structures for reliability. Moscow: Stroyizdat.
  7. Gnedenko, B.V., Belyaev, Yu.K., & Solovyev, A.D. (1965). Mathematical methods in the theory of reliability. Moscow: Nauka.
  8. DSTU 9181:2022. (2022). Guidelines for assessment and forecasting of the technical condition of road bridges. Kyiv: Ministry of Regional Development of Ukraine.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2024-115.1-025-034

Address
01010, Ukraine, Kyiv,
1, M. Omelianovycha-Pavlenka Str.


Email
ntu@arrcjournal.org

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving