• Home
  • Historical notes
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

UkrainianProfessional Education

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 30.06.2023

Revised 29.11.2023

Accepted 28.12.2023

Retrieved from Iss. 114, P. 2, 2023

Pages 56 -67

  • 121 Views

Suggested citation

Golovchenko, V. (2023). OVERVIEW OF TECHNOLOGIES FOR OBTAINING COLD EMULSION-MINERAL MIXTURES. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, (114.2), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2023-114.2-056-067

OVERVIEW OF TECHNOLOGIES FOR OBTAINING COLD EMULSION-MINERAL MIXTURES

Vasil Golovchenko

Abstract

The use of cold emulsion-mineral mixture (CBEM) instead of hot asphalt concrete mixture (HMA) has several advantages. Benefits include saving materials and reducing energy consumption, protecting the environment and reducing costs. Cold mixture obtained by mixing mineral aggregate with bitumen emulsion. Despite the efforts made over the last few decades to improve and develop CBEM, certain disadvantages remain that make it inferior to HMA, leading to the limitation or minimization of its use. However, the development of CBEM for road construction, reconstruction and maintenance is constantly gaining interest in both the industrial and research sectors of road construction. Researchers in the field of road construction are constantly looking for ways to reduce energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and increase cost efficiency. Cold emulsion-mineral mixture is the result of research in this direction during the last few decades. CBEM is a mixture obtained by mixing bitumen emulsion, aggregates and filler at ambient temperature. Using CBEM, it is possible to achieve 95% energy savings compared to the production of HMA. The disadvantages of cold mixture are also obvious. Because the water must evaporate from the bitumen emulsion for the bitumen to adhere to the aggregates, the cold mix may take several weeks to reach its full strength. This can result in lower initial strength and high porosity compared to conventional hot mix asphalt. Also, because of the water in the mix, potential moisture damage and durability are concerns. As a result, CBEM was rarely used as a structural layer of the roof

Keywords:

cold emulsion-mineral mixture, hot asphalt-concrete mixture, emulsion-mineral mixture

References

  1. Gschösser, F. (2011). Environmental assessment of road constructions: Life cycle assessment of Swiss road pavements and an accompanying analysis of construction and maintenance costs. Zurich: ETH Zurich.
  2. Huang, Y., Bird, R.N., & Heidrich, O. (2007). A review of the use of recycled solid waste materials in asphalt pavements. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(1), 58-73. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.02.002.
  3. Roberts, F.L., Mohammad, L.N., & Wang, L.B. (2002). History of hot mix asphalt mixture design in the United States. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 14(4), 279-293. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:4(279).
  4. Skolnik, J., Brooks, M., & Oman, J. (2013). Report 744: Fuel usage factors in highway and bridge construction. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
  5. D’Angelo, et al. (2008). Warm-mix asphalt: European practice. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
  6. Sullivan, E.J., & Moss, A. (2014). Paving cost comparisons: Warm-mix asphalt versus concrete. Skokie, IL: Portland Cement Association Market Intelligence.
  7. Chappat, M., & Bilal, J. (2003). The environmental road of the future: Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission. Paris: Colas Group.
  8. Chehovits, J., & Galehouse, L. (2010). Energy usage and greenhouse gas emissions of pavement preservation processes for asphalt concrete pavements. In Proceedings of the First international conference on pavement preservation (pp. 27-42). Newport Beach, CA. 
  9. Pidwerbesky, B., Beuyenberg, A., & De Bono, J. (2009). Low emissions asphalt – experience to date. In Proceedings of the 13th international flexible pavements conference. Gold Coast, Australia.
  10. Al Nageim, H., Al-Busaltan, S.F., Atherton, W., & Sharples, G. (2012). A comparative study for improving the mechanical properties of cold bituminous emulsion mixtures with cement and waste materials. Construction and Building Materials, 36, 743-748.
  11. Cheng, L. (2013). Developing evaluation method of moisture susceptibility for cold mix asphalt. (Master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA).
  12. Khalid, H.A., & Monney, O.K. (2009). Moisture damage potential of cold asphalt. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 10(1), 39-47.
  13. Olard, F., Noan, C.L., Beduneau, E., & Romier, A. (2008). Low energy asphalts for sustainable road construction. In Proceedings of the 4th Eurasphalt & eurobitume congress (pp. 21-23). Copenhagen.
  14. Partl, M.N. (2010). Sustainable development through asphalt recycling in Switzerland. Paper presented at the International workshop of ISAP technical committee APE asphalt pavements & environment.
  15. Salomon, D.R. (2006). Asphalt emulsion technology. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
  16. Swiertz, D., Johannes, P., Tashman, L., & Bahia, H. (2012). Evaluation of laboratory coating and compaction procedures for cold mix asphalt. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 81.
  17. Oruc, S., Celik, F., & Akpinar, M.V. (2007). Effect of cement on emulsified asphalt mixtures. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 16(5), 578-583.
  18. Hefer, A.W. (2004). Adhesion in bitumen-aggregate systems and quantification of the effects of water on the adhesive bond. (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA).
  19. Fang, X., Winnefeld, F., & Lura, P. (2016). Precipitation of anionic emulsifier with ordinary Portland cement. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 462, 367-373.
  20. Fang, X., Garcia, A., Winnefeld, F., Partl, M.N., & Lura, P. (2016). Impact of rapid-hardening cements on mechanical properties of cement bitumen emulsion asphalt. Materials and Structures, 49(1-2), 487-498.
  21. Brown, S.F., & Needham, D. (2000). A study of cement modified bitumen emulsion mixtures. In Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists (Vol. 69, pp. 1-22).
  22. Cyna, M., & Ossola, M.-F. (Eds.). (2008). Bitumen emulsion. Paris: RGRA.
  23. Serfass, J.-P. (2002). Advantages, peculiarities and mysteries of emulsion cold mixes. RGRA, 802.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2023-114.2-056-067

Address
01010, Ukraine, Kyiv,
1, M. Omelianovycha-Pavlenka Str.


Email
ntu@arrcjournal.org

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving