• Home
  • Historical notes
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

UkrainianProfessional Education

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 24.12.2022

Revised 15.05.2023

Accepted 14.06.2023

Retrieved from Iss. 113, P. 2, 2023

Pages 225 -234

  • 130 Views

Suggested citation

Vorkut, T., Bozhok, Yu., & Kharuta, V. (2023). METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE FORMATION OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROJECTS AS A PROJECT PORTFOLIO. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, (113.2), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2023-113.2-225-234

METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE FORMATION OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROJECTS AS A PROJECT PORTFOLIO

Tetyana Vorkut Yuliya Bozhok Vitalii Kharuta

Abstract

The relevance of the research topic is due to the need to improve and further develop the methodological approach to determining the optimal composition of the portfolio of projects, in terms of developing a model for determining the optimal composition of the portfolio of public participation (PP) projects, which is based on the premises of an alternative formulation of the task of optimizing the portfolio (sub-portfolio) of PP projects - on based on individual ratings of PP projects or a portfolio of PP projects considered together. The purpose of the study: to increase the effectiveness of the management of PP projects on the basis of the development of scientific and methodological principles of management of the totality of PP projects as a portfolio of PP projects. The object of the study is project portfolio management processes and PP project management processes. Research methodology. The method of scientific identification was used when forming the conceptual basis of the study; in the analysis of scientific and methodical approaches to structuring, determination of criteria (evaluation, selection, prioritization) and optimization according to portfolios of PP projects - the method of comparative analysis; to test the hypothesis regarding the insignificance of differences in the aggregates of PP projects separated by thematic directions, the Kruskel–Wallis non-parametric criterion (test) of significance

Keywords:

project management, project portfolio, portfolio-oriented management, public participation projects, public project, public budget

References

  1. Vorkut, T.A., Bilonoh, O.Ye., Horbenko, O.V., Dmytrychenko, A.M., Petunin, A.V., & Sribna, N.V. (2022). Project management of public participation as a field of application of portfolio-oriented management. Bulletin of the National Transport University. Series “Economic Sciences”. Scientific Journal, 2(52), 65-80.
  2. Project Management Institute. (2006). The standard for portfolio management (1st ed.). Newtown Square: Project Management Institute.
  3. Project Management Institute. (2008). The standard for portfolio management (2nd ed.). Newtown Square: Project Management Institute.
  4. Project Management Institute. (2013). The standard for portfolio management (3rd ed.). Newtown Square: Project Management Institute.
  5. Project Management Institute. (2017). The standard for portfolio management (4th ed.). Newtown Square: Project Management Institute.
  6. Kyiv City Council Decision "On Approval of the Regulation on the Public Budget of the City of Kyiv". (2016, December). Retrieved from https://kmr.gov.ua/uk/provisions-public-budget.
  7. Public Budget of Kyiv. Project data for 2020. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://wikiprojects.kyivcity.gov.ua/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=28180652#tab-2020.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2023-113.2-225-234

Address
01010, Ukraine, Kyiv,
1, M. Omelianovycha-Pavlenka Str.


Email
ntu@arrcjournal.org

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving