Article

Received 26.06.2022

Revised 14.11.2022

Accepted 15.12.2022

Retrieved from Iss. 112, 2022

Pages 123 -136

Hubar, Yu., & Kharchenko, A. (2022). IMPACT ON THE VALUE OF LAND BORDER POSITION ERRORS OBTAINED WITH THE USE OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, (112), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2022-112-123-136

IMPACT ON THE VALUE OF LAND BORDER POSITION ERRORS OBTAINED WITH THE USE OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT

Yurii Hubar Anna Kharchenko

The study of the effect of errors in the position of landmarks obtained using unmanned aerial vehicles, on the value of real estate. Aerospace for several decades is an effective tool for conducting geodetic works, geophysical studies and conducting various types of monitoring, but such methods are not used to assess the real estate. Modern technologies for the creation of topographical and cadastral plans are based precisely on the use of digital aerosol materials. However, the cost of using airplanes and helicopters for local large-scale take-off is on an order of magnitude higher and therefore an alternative solution is the use of UAVs. Methodology. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are most often used as a cheap alternative to conventional airplanes from airplanes, helicopters, telescopes and satellite (satellite) takeoffs. In addition to significant costeffectiveness (cheaper by ten times), UAVs have additional privileges, namely: low altitude, point-and-shoot, mobility, environmental cleanliness of flights. Land management works are mostly carried out unsystematically and without reliable control, and therefore the application of usual geodetic methods and measurement results does not allow obtaining the required precision of the coordinates of the points, boundaries and the film basis. All this leads to the problems of combining the boundaries of adjoining areas due to the use of poor-quality cadastral information in databases that were formed over a significant period of time by the regional centers of the SLC. Results. The use of UAVs proves the importance of them to perform valuation works, which will increase the accuracy of the determination of the coordinates of the boundaries of real estate and significantly accelerate the evaluation procedure. It is established that for large settlements, the accuracy of the determination of the coordinates should be significantly increased, since the cost of real estate in these settlements is quite large and, accordingly, the errors in determining the coordinates of real estate objects lead to errors in the cost of real estate objects of the settlement, which is legally unacceptable and therefore For very large cities it is expedient to create shots at low altitudes and gradually increase the accuracy of photographing the terrain

real estate evaluation; unmanned aerial vehicle; apriori accuracy estimation; remote sensing of land; market value of real estate
  1. Haletskyi, V., et al. (2012). Experimental analysis of works on creating large-scale plans of rural settlements using UAVs. Geodesy, Cartography and Aerial Photography, 76, 85-93.
  2. Hlotov, V., et al. (2014). Analysis and prospects of aerial photography from unmanned aerial vehicles. Modern Achievements of Geodetic Science and Production, 1(27), 131-136.
  3. Burshtynska, Kh.V., & Stankevych, S.A. (2013). Aerospace imaging systems. Lviv: Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House.
  4. Hlotov, V., & Hunina, A. (2014). Analysis of the possibilities of using unmanned aerial vehicles for aerial imaging processes. Modern Achievements of Geodetic Science and Production, 2(28), 65-70.
  5. Hlotov, V.M., & Smolii, K.B. (2008). Research on technologies for compiling frontal plans of architectural structures using terrestrial digital photography and laser scanning. Geodesy, Cartography and Aerial Photography, 70, 46-50.
  6. Hubar, Yu. (2017). Analysis of the feasibility of using unmanned aerial vehicles for mass valuation of real estate in settlements. In Materials of the II All-Ukrainian scientific conference “Geodesy, land management, geoinformatics in the southern region: Current state and development prospects” (pp. 131-135). Odesa.
  7. Hubar, Yu. (2011). Determination of the required accuracy of coordinates of boundary markers for the valuation of land in settlements. Geodesy, Cartography and Aerial Photography, 74, 132-135.
  8. Dorozhynskyi, O., & Pochkin, S. (2009). On some requirements of cadastral works for aerospace imaging. Modern Achievements of Geodetic Science and Production, 1(17), 209-216.
  9. Law of Ukraine "On Topographic-Geodetic and Cartographic Activities". (1999). Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 5, article number 46.
  10. Lobanov, A.N. (1984). Photogrammetry. Moscow: Nedra.
  11. Matiichyk, M.P., & Kachalo, I.A. (2013). Trends in the application of unmanned aerial vehicles in civil aviation. In Materials of the XI international scientific and technical conference "AVIA 2013" (p. 97).
  12. Stankevych, S.A., & Vasko, A.V. (2011). Application of modern aerospace imaging technologies in the agricultural sector. In Scientific aspects of geodesy, land management and information technologies: Proceedings of the scientific-practical conference (pp. 44-50).
  13. Junqing, C., Zongjian, L., Xiaojing, W., & Yongrong, L. (2012). Application ol UAV system tor low altitude photogrammetry in Shanxi. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXXIX-B1, 351-354. doi: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B1-351-2012.
  14. Droeschel, D., Schreiber, M., & Behnke, S. (2013). Omnidirectional perception for lightweight UAVs using a continuously rotating 3D laser scanner. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL-1/W2, 107-112. doi: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W2-107-2013.
  15. Gini, R., Passoni, D., Pinto, L., & Sona, G. (2012). Aerial images from an UAV system: 3D modeling and tree species classification in a park area. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXXIX-B1, 361-366. doi: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B1-361-2012.
  16. Grenzdorffer, G., Niemeyer, F., & Schmidt, F. (2012). Development of four vision camera system for a Micro-UAV. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXXIX-B1, 369-374. doi: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B1-369-2012.
  17. Kurczynski, Z. (2006). Aerial and satellite imaging of the Earth. Warsaw: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej.
  18. Makelainen, A., Saari, H., Hippi, I., Sarkeala, J., & Soukkamaki, J. (2013). 2D-hyperspectral frame imager camera data in photogrammetric mosaicking. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL-1/W2, 263-267. doi: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W2-263-2013.
  19. Hubar, Yu. (2016). The use of unmanned aerial vehicles for estimating market real-estate value. Geodesy, Cartography and Aerial Photography, 84, 76-89.

https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2022-112-123-136