• Home
  • Historical notes
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts
en English
  • Українська Українська

UkrainianProfessional Education

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 17.07.2022

Revised 09.11.2022

Accepted 15.12.2022

Retrieved from Iss. 112, 2022

Pages 145 -153

  • 140 Views

Suggested citation

Dovgopolyuk, L., Neizvestna, N., Soloviova, N., & Chaichevskyi, V. (2022). ANALYSIS OF TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MODERN GEODESIC INSTRUMENTS. Automobile Roads and Road Construction, (112), 145-153. https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2022-112-145-153

ANALYSIS OF TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MODERN GEODESIC INSTRUMENTS

Lyudmyla Dovgopolyuk Natalia Neizvestna Nataliia Soloviova Viktor Chaichevskyi

Abstract

It is known that the requirements for the quality of geodetic works are growing rapidly. The need for constant improvement of the general technical level of geodetic works, reliability, accuracy, manufacturability of geodetic production also grows. Issues of accuracy of geodetic works are of fundamental importance, because they ultimately determine the level of quality and reliability of geodetic networks and geodetic measurements. When assessing the reliability and accuracy of measurements, the main thing is to choose the perfect method of geodetic works and appropriate instruments and equipment, based on the specified technological requirements of the project and tolerances. Today's modern geodetic instrument is a product of high technology, which combines the latest advances in electronics, precision mechanics, optics, materials science and other sciences. Progress does not stand still, analog devices tested for years are replaced by modern digital and laser equipment. There were more requirements for geodetic works. They must be performed as soon as possible and with high accuracy. The article considers three types of modern geodetic equipment, namely: electronic theodolite, total station, and laser rangefinder. For a detailed analysis, the technical characteristics of the devices of several leading manufacturers were taken: Leica, Topcon, Sokkia, SOUTH, BOSCH. Their advantages and disadvantages, both in general and in comparison with each other, are revealed. The most relevant areas of application and features of use are analyzed. Despite the wide range of modern geodetic instruments, the question of the ratio of their price and quality remains relevant. A detailed study of the technical characteristics, taking into account the scope of application of a device allows the specialist to make the most appropriate choice. The accuracy, speed and cost of work are directly affected by the correct selection of equipment that will perform geodetic measurements

Keywords:

geodesy, geodetic equipment, total station, electronic theodolite, laser rangefinder, comparative analysis

References

  1. Trevoho, I., Vovk, A., & Lisniakov, S. (2019). On the accuracy of angular measurements with digital theodolites. Modern Achievements of Geodetic Science and Production, 2(38), 40-44. doi: 10.33841/1819-1339-2019-2-38-40-44.
  2. Borovyi, V.O., & Litnarovych, R.M. (2005). Geodetic instruments. Retrieved from https://docplayer.net/51946411-V-o-boroviy-r-m-litnarovich-geodezichni-priladi.html.
  3. Kalynych, I.V., Radysh, I.P., & Vash, Ya.I. (2021). Electronic geodetic instruments. Lecture notes. Uzhhorod: Uzhhorod National University “Hoverla” Publishing House.
  4. Sokkia total stations. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ukrgeo.com.ua/products/taxeometry/vysokotochnye-taxeometry/sokkia-net/vysokotochnyjtaxeometr-sokkia-net1ax.html.
  5. Topcon total stations. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://tnt-tpi.com/standartni-takheometri/30-takheometr-topcon-gm-105-el.html.
  6. Leica total stations. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.leica.kiev.ua/leica-ts15-i-r1000-1.html.
  7. Podostroets, K.O. (2017). Development and research of a new method for verification of geodetic measuring instruments. (PhD dissertation, Odesa, Ukraine).
  8. Leica electronic theodolite. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.leica.kiev.ua/leica-builder-109.html.
  9. Electronic theodolite. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://geomarket.in.ua/ua/teodolity/elektronnye-teodolity/.
  10. Laser distance meters. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://instrumentarium.com.ua/katalog/izmeritelnaya-tehnika/dalnomeru/bosch and https://leicageosystems.com.ua/product/disto-d2.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

https://doi.org/10.33744/0365-8171-2022-112-145-153

Address
01010, Ukraine, Kyiv,
1, M. Omelianovycha-Pavlenka Str.


Email
ntu@arrcjournal.org

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy
  • Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving